Organisations face a difficult balancing act. They are expected to reduce emissions, manage rising costs, strengthen resilience and prepare for an evolving regulatory landscape, all while operating under increased scrutiny and tighter budgets.
During Trio’s recent Leadership Roundtable, senior leaders from real estate, manufacturing, retail, professional services and other sectors explored how organisations can continue progressing their decarbonisation goals while delivering measurable business value. Through expert panel discussion, collaborative workshops and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing, several clear themes emerged.
One of the strongest messages from the session was that sustainability initiatives are increasingly being assessed through a commercial lens.
Where organisations may once have pursued projects primarily to meet corporate commitments or align with industry trends, leadership teams are now placing greater emphasis on tangible business outcomes. Cost reduction, cost avoidance, resilience, operational efficiency and competitiveness are becoming central to investment decisions.
With capital constrained and projects competing for funding, carbon reduction alone is often no longer enough to secure approval. Successful business cases must demonstrate broader value, whether through lower operating costs, reduced exposure to future risks, improved resilience or a stronger market position. Cost and payback remain important, but organisations must also consider the longer-term cost of delaying action.
Energy price volatility remains a major concern across sectors.
The panel highlighted the increasing complexity of energy markets and the need for organisations to take a longer-term approach to managing exposure to future cost shocks. Longer-term procurement strategies, energy efficiency, onsite generation, storage and renewable energy agreements can all play a role, depending on an organisation’s requirements and risk appetite.
Attendees also discussed the challenges associated with electrification. While it can support decarbonisation, it may increase exposure to electricity costs and place additional demands on already constrained energy infrastructure.
Energy procurement, risk management and sustainability can therefore no longer operate in isolation. Closer collaboration between sustainability, procurement, finance, risk and operational teams is needed to balance cost, flexibility, resilience and decarbonisation objectives effectively.
Supply chain disruption was identified as another important strategic risk.
Participants discussed the value of reducing dependence on a single supplier, market, technology or fuel source. This can help organisations manage geopolitical uncertainty, energy disruption and changing market conditions while supporting greater business continuity.
Supply chain resilience can also strengthen the commercial case for decarbonisation initiatives. By considering energy, carbon and supply chain exposure together, organisations can identify solutions that reduce emissions while protecting operations from future cost increases and disruption.
However, attendees also highlighted practical barriers. Suppliers may not always have the expertise, evidence or capability needed to recommend and implement the most efficient technologies. Early engagement with suppliers and technical stakeholders is therefore essential to identify potential barriers, test assumptions and ensure that proposed solutions can deliver the expected results.
While new technologies continue to create opportunities for decarbonisation, many attendees agreed that implementation challenges often have less to do with the availability of technology and more to do with ownership, governance and accountability.
This was particularly evident within the real estate sector, where participants discussed the complexity of landlord-tenant relationships, service charge structures and split incentives. Questions around who should fund improvements, who benefits from the savings and who is ultimately responsible for delivery continue to create barriers to progress.
Attendees also highlighted significant variations between organisations. Some portfolios have access to substantial investment capital, while others face much tighter constraints, influencing both the pace and scale of decarbonisation activity.
Green leases were identified as an important mechanism for improving collaboration between landlords and occupiers, clarifying responsibilities and creating stronger incentives to support energy efficiency and carbon reduction initiatives.
Reliable data continues to play a critical role in compliance, investment planning and decision-making.
The panel explored the growing importance of reporting, materiality assessments, climate scenario planning and sustainability disclosures. Workshop discussions also highlighted the challenges organisations face in managing an increasingly complex reporting landscape, with many required to provide similar information across multiple frameworks and stakeholder requests.
However, collecting data is only part of the challenge. Organisations need clear ownership, governance and accountability structures to turn information into meaningful action. Centralised data, combined with a clear strategy and defined responsibilities, can support stronger business cases and more measurable outcomes.
The discussion also reinforced the importance of human insight. Technology and data can help identify opportunities, but successful decarbonisation ultimately depends on engaging the people who operate buildings, manage facilities, work within factories and influence how energy is used each day.
A recurring theme throughout the session was the value of collaboration.
Organisations across different sectors are often facing similar challenges, whether around procurement strategies, reporting requirements, technology adoption or securing investment. Sector associations, peer networks and knowledge-sharing forums can help organisations learn from one another and make better-informed decisions.
However, meaningful collaboration can be difficult in practice, particularly when organisations operate in competitive environments or are reluctant to share their challenges openly. Building the trust needed for productive collaboration takes time.
Despite these barriers, participants agreed that open conversations, shared experiences and practical knowledge exchange can help organisations avoid common mistakes and navigate change more effectively.
While the discussion covered a wide range of topics and sectors, one conclusion was shared across the room: preparation is critical.
Whether organisations are responding to energy market volatility, strengthening their supply chains, preparing for future reporting requirements or developing a business case for investment, early planning can help identify barriers, align stakeholders and secure the necessary approvals.
Developing a clear, multi-year roadmap allows organisations to prioritise action, establish responsibilities and evaluate different solutions before implementation. Although this work may not deliver immediate results, it can prevent unnecessary delays and support more confident investment decisions later.
The roundtable reinforced that cost avoidance, decarbonisation and resilience are no longer separate business objectives. Organisations increasingly need to address all three together, demonstrating how sustainability initiatives contribute not only to environmental goals but also to long-term competitiveness, organisational resilience and business performance.
Interested in exploring these topics further?
We are offering dedicated time with our subject matter experts to discuss energy strategy, cost avoidance, decarbonisation, supply chain resilience and wider business resilience challenges. Whether you are developing a business case, evaluating investment opportunities or planning your next steps, our team is here to help.